Episode 5: Missing Images Are a Data Problem. Start Treating Them Like One.

‍

Go to your website right now. Pick any category. Count the gray placeholders.

If more than 10% of your products are sitting there without an image, your customers are seeing that too. And the vast majority of them will go and buy from someone else.

That's the uncomfortable truth that sits behind what often gets dismissed as a "marketing issue" or a "supplier issue." Missing images are a data quality problem. One of the most costly ones you can have, because it's the one your customers can actually see.

Why images keep falling through the cracks

Most catalog teams know they have a missing image problem. What's harder to pin down is why it keeps happening, especially when you're already putting effort into data quality elsewhere.

The answer is almost always the same: nobody actually owns the image.

Images live in a strange no-man's land between marketing, suppliers, and IT. Because they don't sit cleanly in anyone's remit, they slip through at multiple points in the process:

The supplier sends specs but no images. The product gets created. The image field sits empty. Nobody follows up. The product goes live anyway.

The images exist, but they're unlabelled. File names like image1274.jpg mean nobody can match them to SKUs at speed. They sit in a backlog, sometimes for months.

The images are the wrong type. A lifestyle shot instead of a white background product image. The wrong resolution for print. Not optimised for a particular channel. Instead of going back to get the right asset, the product gets pushed live without anything.

The product gets updated but the old image is pulled. New packaging, new branding, new colour. Rather than showing an outdated shot, the team removes it and means to replace it. The replacement never comes.

A platform migration breaks the links. The copy migrates fine. The image URLs point to a CDN that no longer exists. Nobody checks. Nobody notices until customers start seeing placeholders.

Each of these is a process failure. But they're also a data failure, because there's no system treating the image field with the same rigour as a title, a description, or a price.

What it's actually costing you

The conversion impact of a missing image is obvious when you think about it directly: a product page with an image will outperform one without, every time.

But the downstream effects compound.

For technical products especially, buyers need to see what they're buying. Is it the right connector? The right fitting? The right size? If they can't see it on your site, they'll find somewhere they can. The chance of them coming back to complete the purchase is low.

There's also a trust dimension. A gray placeholder communicates something to a buyer: we don't care enough about this product to show it to you. For distributors and retailers trying to position themselves as reliable, that's a real reputational cost.

On marketplaces, the consequences are structural. Listings without images get suppressed. Google Shopping requires them. On your own site, imageless products get buried in search and filtered out of recommendation engines. They don't just underperform. They become invisible.

And for B2B distributors running large long-tail catalogs, this is rarely a fringe problem. It's common to see 20 to 30% of a catalog sitting without imagery. That's not a gap. That's a significant chunk of your range that isn't working for you at all.

What to do about it

The goal isn't to go and photograph your entire catalog. The goal is two things: get a usable image on every product page, and put a process in place that stops any new product launching without one.

Here's how to approach it:

Score the problem first. Run a completeness audit on your imagery the same way you'd run one on text attributes. How many SKUs have at least one image? How many meet your minimum resolution? You can't prioritise what you haven't measured.

Triage by revenue. Your top products by revenue should get proper sourced imagery, whether that's manufacturer images, web-sourced assets (within copyright), or photography. Your long tail might only need a minimum viable image for now. Something on every page is better than a placeholder, even if it's not perfect.

Fix the problem at the source. When a supplier submits product data, images need to be part of that submission. Not a separate follow-up. Not a parallel process. Part of the intake. If your supplier onboarding doesn't require images alongside specs, you're guaranteeing gaps before you've even started.

Set a gate. No product goes live without at least one image that meets your minimum spec. Treat it the same way you'd treat a missing title or a missing price. This one rule, consistently applied, stops the problem from compounding.

The takeaway

Missing images are the most visible data problem your customers encounter. They see them. They make decisions based on them. And they rarely come back once they've gone elsewhere.

The reason they keep happening isn't a lack of effort. It's a lack of ownership and a lack of process. When you treat images as a data field with the same rigour you give to any other attribute, the gap closes.

Score them. Source them. Stop publishing without them.

‍